Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; gh topics, links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub
#22
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
westurner
changed the title
westurner
changed the title
Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub
westurner
changed the title
Framework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHubFramework :: Jupyter PyPI Trove Classifier; gh topics, links of Notebook, Hub, Lab, BinderHub
|
Here's four more:
|
|
http://ipython.org/documentation.html https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ http://ipyparallel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ https://github.com/topics/ipython-extension (0 results ... https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/config/extensions/ https://github.com/ipython/ipython/wiki/Extensions-Index https://github.com/ipython-contrib/IPython-extensions https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/interactive/magics.html
|
|
Hey, sorry for the slow response. Just looking at this now. Given that master has advanced quite a bit, I'm going to cherry-pick things from this branch into smaller bits. For example the GitHub topics have been merged in with #34. |
Merged in with markusschanta#34.
| - Source: https://github.com/jupyter/notebook | ||
| - Docs: https://jupyter-notebook.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ | ||
| - https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/A-gallery-of-interesting-Jupyter-Notebooks | ||
| - IPython |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most of the IPython section looks rather stale. The last IPEP is from 2014 and the wiki looks quite dated too. With the split of the Jupyter and IPython projects, the IPython parts seem less relevant to me. What do you think?
|
IPython is still the basis for the Python Jupyter kennel. Whether that's
relevant to these docs IDK
…On Monday, September 3, 2018, Markus Schanta ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In README.md
<#22 (comment)>
:
> + - Q&A: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/jupyter
+ - Source: https://github.com/jupyter
+ - Docs: https://jupyter.org/documentation
+ - Docs: **https://jupyter.readthedocs.io/en/stable/**
+ - Jupyter Governance
+ https://github.com/jupyter/governance
+ - JEP: Jupyter Enhancement Proposal
+ - https://github.com/jupyter/enhancement-proposals
+ - Blog: https://blog.jupyter.org/
+ - Twitter: ***@***.***(https://twitter.com/ProjectJupyter)
+- Jupyter Notebook
+ -
+ - Source: https://github.com/jupyter/notebook
+ - Docs: https://jupyter-notebook.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
+ - https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/A-gallery-of-interesting-Jupyter-Notebooks
+- IPython
Most of the IPython section looks rather stale. The last IPEP is from 2014
<https://github.com/ipython/ipython/wiki/IPEPs:-IPython-Enhancement-Proposals>
and the wiki <https://github.com/ipython/ipython/wiki> looks quite dated
too. With the split <https://blog.jupyter.org/the-big-split-9d7b88a031a7>
of the Jupyter and IPython projects, the IPython parts seem less relevant
to me. What do you think?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADGy-PmnvvQYb3Ea8-uFVBrzmCUBzcvks5uXVijgaJpZM4UpolL>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a number of bare links.
I think the bare links (links without anchor text) are justified because:
I would add them before the fold,
but they may be fine where there are at the end.
I could add TOC entries (or
.. contents::in RST) for each of the projects?